Overview
Red teaming in Dataframer enables you to generate adversarial examples and challenging scenarios to test the robustness, security, and reliability of your AI systems. Unlike standard generation, red teaming focuses on edge cases, boundary conditions, and potentially problematic inputs.What is Red Teaming?
Red teaming is the practice of deliberately generating challenging, adversarial, or edge-case examples to:- Test System Limits: Discover how your AI behaves under unusual conditions
- Identify Vulnerabilities: Find security weaknesses or failure modes
- Improve Robustness: Create training data for edge cases
- Ensure Safety: Test for harmful, biased, or inappropriate outputs
- Validate Guardrails: Verify safety measures work correctly
Red teaming helps build more robust and reliable AI systems by proactively identifying issues.
Red Teaming Workflow
1
Create a Red Team Spec
Define what adversarial characteristics you want to test (e.g., jailbreaks, prompt injections, edge cases).
2
Generate Adversarial Samples
Create challenging examples targeting specific vulnerabilities or edge cases.
3
Test Your System
Feed generated samples into your AI system to observe behavior.
4
Analyze Results
Identify failures, unexpected behaviors, or security issues.
5
Improve & Iterate
Update your system and repeat the process.
Creating a Red Team Specification
Red team specs define the adversarial characteristics to target:Adversarial Target Types
Prompt Injection
Test if attackers can inject malicious instructions: Examples:- “Ignore previous instructions and…”
- “System: New directive…”
- Hidden instructions in user input
Jailbreak Attempts
Try to bypass system restrictions: Examples:- Role-playing scenarios
- Hypothetical questions
- Character impersonation
Edge Cases
Boundary conditions and unusual inputs: Examples:- Extreme values
- Empty or null inputs
- Malformed data
- Unicode attacks
Bias Testing
Probe for biased or inappropriate responses: Examples:- Sensitive demographic topics
- Controversial subjects
- Stereotyping triggers
Safety Testing
Test safety guardrails: Examples:- Harmful content requests
- Dangerous instruction generation
- Privacy violation attempts
Generating Red Team Samples
Once you have a red team spec, generate adversarial samples:| Parameter | Type | Description |
|---|---|---|
spec_id | string | Red team specification ID |
number_of_samples | integer | Number of adversarial samples (1-500) |
difficulty | string | "easy", "medium", "hard", or "extreme" |
attack_categories | array | Types of attacks to generate |
model | string | LLM model to use (optional) |
Difficulty Levels
Easy: Basic adversarial attempts, easy to detect- Simple prompt injections
- Obvious manipulation attempts
- Low sophistication
- Subtle instruction manipulation
- Context-aware attacks
- Requires some defense
- Multi-step attacks
- Context confusion
- Sophisticated bypasses
- Novel attack vectors
- Multi-layered deception
- Cutting-edge techniques
Monitoring Red Team Generation
Check generation status:Retrieving Red Team Samples
Download generated adversarial samples:Testing Your System
Use generated samples to test your AI:Best Practices
Start with Lower Difficulty
Start with Lower Difficulty
Begin with “easy” or “medium” difficulty to establish baseline defenses before testing harder attacks.
Diverse Attack Types
Diverse Attack Types
Test multiple attack categories to ensure comprehensive coverage:
- Prompt injection
- Jailbreaks
- Edge cases
- Bias triggers
- Safety boundaries
Iterative Testing
Iterative Testing
- Generate red team samples
- Test your system
- Identify vulnerabilities
- Implement defenses
- Generate new samples
- Repeat
Document Findings
Document Findings
Keep detailed records of:
- Which attacks succeeded
- How vulnerabilities were exploited
- Mitigation strategies that worked
- Areas needing improvement
Responsible Testing
Responsible Testing
- Test in controlled environments
- Don’t deploy untested systems
- Keep red team samples secure
- Follow responsible disclosure practices
Red Team Evaluation
Evaluate how well your system handles adversarial samples:- Success rate (attacks blocked)
- Vulnerability categories found
- Severity assessment
- Recommended mitigations
Use Cases
LLM Application Security
Test chatbots and LLM applications for:- Prompt injection vulnerabilities
- Data exfiltration attempts
- Unauthorized access
- Instruction manipulation
Model Robustness
Evaluate model behavior on:- Out-of-distribution inputs
- Adversarial examples
- Edge cases
- Unexpected formats
Safety Alignment
Verify safety measures for:- Harmful content generation
- Bias and fairness
- Privacy protection
- Ethical boundaries
Compliance Testing
Ensure regulatory compliance:- Data protection (GDPR)
- Content moderation
- Age-appropriate content
- Industry-specific regulations
Common Attack Patterns
Direct Instruction Override
Direct Instruction Override
Role Confusion
Role Confusion
Hypothetical Scenarios
Hypothetical Scenarios
Encoded Instructions
Encoded Instructions
Context Manipulation
Context Manipulation
Mitigation Strategies
Input Validation: Sanitize and validate all user inputs Instruction Hierarchy: Establish clear precedence for system vs user instructions Context Isolation: Separate system instructions from user content Output Filtering: Monitor and filter potentially harmful outputs Rate Limiting: Prevent automated attack attempts Monitoring: Log and analyze suspicious patternsRed Team Metrics
Track key metrics to measure security posture:| Metric | Description | Target |
|---|---|---|
| Defense Rate | % of attacks successfully blocked | >95% |
| False Positive Rate | % of legitimate queries blocked | <5% |
| Detection Time | Time to identify attack | <100ms |
| Severity Distribution | Breakdown by attack severity | Track trends |

